Ok, so let's make something clear, both dems and reps both create large amounts of debt. Everyone is equally responsible of the debt in our country and everyone is guilty for being sell outs. If you don't want debt the only candidate would be Ron Paul, a libertarian.
Also all of these are because of oil, but everyone is guilty of wanting oil. Don't pull the only republicans want to go to war because our current regime is running into Libya for oil and there were dems in congress when the Iraq incident occurred.
Finally the democrats are as guilty for protecting CEOs as are republicans. Democrats take more bribes and give out more money in special interests than republicans do. Finally just look at GE, look how they just so happen to get no taxes.
In conclusion everyone is wasteful! And that's why we need more independent candidates. And food is going up because of the instability in the middle east which could be solved if we drilled at home. And just look at healthcare, democrats are the reason why the system is messed up and costs so much. If you say that medicare is necessary, sure it is, but a system where people who are capable of getting jobs yet decide to live off the system is corrupt. Also what really could limit the budget is fixing our prison system, maybe instead of having to run a bunch of cops around catching people. We should think proactively and educate people to not do crimes, and we should stiffen sentencing to prevent all of this. We could also possibly let poorer, more likely to be criminal kids to join the military so that they get a sense of discipline. Then on top of that, we could have more charter schools in crime likely areas as well.
Also affirmative action needs to be
prohibited like in England.
Obama has been as wasteful if not more wasteful than any other politician. If you try to sugar coat his print print print strategy you are deluded. As it HASN'T WORKED! The economy is double dipping and helicopter Ben is still calling for even more running of the presses. Permalink
-All politicians are crooks who do not care for the good of the people, only the good of their wallets.
-The time for affirmative action is over. It should have never begun. Slavery should still be instated, but I'll settle for segregation.
-America should go isolationist again. No one appreciates the world police job, get over it. Let's turtle up and take care of ourselves. How can we help others with people starving in our own streets?
-Develop alternative energies, drill while they're being perfected. Never rely on outsiders again.
Quoting Thomas N
False. We're there for human rights. And we didn't start another pointless land like Iraq or Afghanistan.
Ok, then how come we haven't stepped in in Syria or all of the warring African states. It's obvious we are there for oil.
Also a majority of democrats were pro-war. In fact more democrats voted for the war than against it. Sure, only 1 Republican vetoed, but there were only 49 Republicans in the senate. So yeah, the Democrats had the majority, and could have surely filibustered their way to getting RES 114 to not pass. If you think I'm denying Republicans' involvement in getting us in the war, I'm not. I just believe that everyone is at fault, and just blaming Bush is really wrong. Permalink
How much oil were we getting from Iraq prior to the war? Well the answer is not as much as before. Meaning that saying the Iraq War was for oil doesn't make sense, so I think saying we are there for oil are complete lies. And most likely our allies are doing it for oil or at least are trying to protect their ties to oil.
Exactly how is America not socially just? Sure there are small incidents, but nothing is perfect. Permalink
So Saddam's regime is much better than Gaddaffi's.
Also women are held to an equal regard, they hold very prominent positions in society, and contribute as much if not more than men. I laugh when you put cultural persecution of h0m0s3xuals and Muslims together in a sentence. I hope you realize that it is against Islamic religion to have h0m0s3xuals. Another thing is that Muslims are treated fairly, and are allowed to practice freely as long as they don't hurt others. Finally you cannot change society, the people in society can think and believe what ever they want. There is no way for the government to even attempt to make decisions for the people. Permalink
The most powerful person in America was almost a woman, I don't know about you, but that says a lot about accepting in my book. Also women have been integrated into society, and do the same jobs, and receive about equal pay. Sure, women are paid a bit less, but one can also argue colleges pick women and minorities over others. There is no perfect society, these business are not part of the government, they are private organizations. They are completely allowed to do what ever they want, and if you have a problem with that, then don't buy their products.
The point I was making was that if Muslims were allowed to do everything that they wanted and not have anyone pick morals, than hom0s3xuals would get murdered every day. So society's judgments on character and how one should act ethically is important. If you feel that they should be able to do everything exactly to their religion, than everyone that isn't a Muslim wouldn't exist. I'm not saying that there aren't good Muslims, but those are the Muslims that don't practice their religion to the letter. They can also be considered to not be Islamic because they have split from their origin so much. Permalink
Because I've come across race relations in my homeland; mainly, it's the maori complaining about being oppressed about forty years ago, having their land stolen off them about two hundred years ago (which they stole off the original owners long before that), moaning about the unfairness of the Waitangi Treaty, etcetera. There's just about never any truth behind it, either. Permalink
The koran still speaks out against Hom0s3xuality, and under your interpretations of fairness, that is not fair and is unjust. I'm not saying Muslims all want to kill everyone, I'm just saying interpretation of the koran causes that. I feel that society needs to put down a line on morality and ethics, and it should be completely fair to judge those who cross it.
On women, doesn't the koran believe that women should not be treated correctly and fairly? I'm finding it a bit ironic that one of the things that your saying should be allowed to practice without judgment on their morals believes in unfair treatment of the other two.
On another note, there is equal pay, it's illegal to pay men and women that do the same task unequally. Now if your arguing about the census study. Here's the thing, the numbers are evening out. So eventually time will solve the problem. The trend of non-equal pay only exist in older women, and slowly as they retire, the average will eventually equal out. As we advance each generation by each, the average will equalize, and for now outliers are the reason why there exists a 75 cents on the dollar. Permalink
I'm not arguing with you because we are just arguing to reach the same thing. We believe the same things, that everyone should be equal, and be equal to belief. Everyone is entitled to be equal in belief and how they live their lives. But you confused me because I thought you meant anyone could practice whatever they wanted. The only thing we differ in is that I believe that the government should have 0 say in society and its decisions. It is my belief that society will iron out its own problems, and government intereference will just make everything messy. Permalink
Or if Conservatives weren't so afraid of stem cell research...
It's not about stem cells, it's about WHICH type of stem cells. It has been found that embryonic stem cells can, in fact, cause cancer because of their unpredictable nature. Adult stem cells are much better because they have been 'trained' by the body, not some juvenile force of nature waiting to be released. The only reason people are so adamant about embryonic sells is because it puts a happy face on abortion.
Like blood, adults would be perfectly willing to donate stem cells to those in need. There is absolutely no reason to harvest them from innocents who have no say. Permalink